Computer games, trust, and immediacy: Role-playing as immigrants in the South

Trust in racial and ethnic diversity has been decreasing in America for the better part of a century. The present study replicated a games-based approach to establishing trust in immigrants during COVID-19. Students in an online American National Government class created a fictional persona from either Mexico, India, or China, and sought U.S. citizenship. A posttest-only control group design was analyzed during Fall 2021 and Spring 2022. Subjects who played the game had significantly higher levels of trust in immigrants. They trusted immigrants from China, India, and the Middle East at higher levels than the control group did as well. Immediacy also interacted with role-playing group, such that applying for citizenship as Chinese immigrants had the largest effect on trusting when the experience was perceived as realistic, immersive, and engaging. Pretending to be less visible immigrant groups appears to generalize trust to immigrants from everywhere at high levels of immediacy. • This study replicates a past experiment, this time using a control group. • Playing a game where characters apply for citizenship leads to trusting immigrants. • Playing as larger, more visible groups leads to trusting immigrants in general. • When playing as less visible groups, immediacy is important for trusting. • Realism, immersion, and engagement can be used to facilitate trust when gaming. [ FROM AUTHOR]

Computer games, trust, and immediacy: Role-playing as immigrants in the South

Trust in racial and ethnic diversity has been decreasing in America for the better part of a century. The present study replicated a games-based approach to establishing trust in immigrants during COVID-19. Students in an online American National Government class created a fictional persona from either Mexico, India, or China, and sought U.S. citizenship. A posttest-only control group design was analyzed during Fall 2021 and Spring 2022. Subjects who played the game had significantly higher levels of trust in immigrants. They trusted im migrants from China, India, and the Middle East at higher levels than the control group did as well. Immediacy also interacted with role-playing group, such that applying for citizenship as Chinese immigrants had the largest effect on trusting when the experience was perceived as realistic, immersive, and engaging. Pretending to be less visible immigrant groups appears to generalize trust to immigrants from everywhere at high levels of immediacy.

Psychophysiology, cognition, and political differences: Guest editors' introduction to the special issue.

We introduce the Politics and the Life Sciences special issue on Psychophysiology, Cognition, and Political Differences. This issue represents the second special issue funded by the Association for Politics and the Life Sciences that adheres to the Open Science Framework for registered reports (RR). Here pre-analysis plans (PAPs) are peer-reviewed and given in-principle acceptance (IPA) prior to data being collected and/or analyzed, and are published contingent upon the preregistration of the study being followed as proposed. Bound by a common theme of the importance of incorporating psychophysiological perspectives into the study of politics, broadly defined, the articles in this special issue feature a unique set of research questions and methodologies. In the following, we summarize the findings, discuss the innovations produced by this research, and highlight the importance of open science for the future of political science research.